Best Practices
- Verify Address Accuracy: Cross-reference addresses against known locations in your jurisdiction
- Check for Duplicates: Look for existing locations with slight address variations
- Boundary Verification: Ensure locations fall within your AHJ boundaries
- Regular Review Schedule: Process pending locations promptly to avoid backlogs
- Clear Documentation: Provide specific, detailed comments when rejecting locations
- Coordinate with Service Providers: Communicate standards and expectations clearly
Troubleshooting & FAQs
Common Issues
Problem: Cannot see locations requiring review
Solution: Verify you have proper ITM permissions and check filter settings
Problem: Rejection reasons are unclear
Solution: Use specific reason codes and detailed comments for better tracking
Problem: Approved location still shows as pending
Solution: Refresh the page or contact system administrator if issue persists
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What happens to ITM reports when I reject a location?
A: All ITM reports associated with that location are automatically rejected using your specified reason code and comment.
Q: Can I change my decision after approving or rejecting a location?
A: Contact your system administrator as location status changes may require additional permissions.
Q: How often should I review pending locations?
A: Regular review ensures Service Providers receive timely feedback and prevents processing delays.
Q: What criteria should I use for approval decisions?
A: Consider address accuracy, jurisdiction boundaries, duplicate prevention, and location type appropriateness.